M. Bransten
The Trademark of the Low Moor Iron Company was registered on 27 Jan. 1879 (see file for Gazette of that Date, Notification No. 19). I cannot gather from Ord. 16 of 1873 and the Schedule of Fees thereunder what (if anything) should be paid on transfer of such Registration to "Low Moor Company Limited"; but I expect the Attorney General will want his usual fee ($25) for reporting.
The applicant has applied for the title and that the Attorney General will also consider itself entitled to charge $25 as if it were a fresh Registration. But the charge in that case seems excessive.
? Send copy (with encl.) to fw., suggesting that the Schedule be amended by adding a scale of fee to be applied in this case, and that such fee be fixed at Agent's rates (say ... to meet such cases).
I have received the fee £10.8.4 in respect of Wilkinsmis Trademark. I inform M. Johnson that it will be referred to fur.
The writer suggests to Mr. Johnson that to avoid delay in the Registration, it would be better to pay £10.8.4 in respect of the Low Moor Company's Trademark, understanding that if a lower rate is fixed, the balance will be returned to him.
GR927/3
[As the Att. Gen. is in future not to have private practice, should he be allowed to receive his extravagant fee in connection with Registration of Trademarks? We might take this opportunity to suggest abolishing the Attorney General's fee altogether as soon as the present holder of that office retires?]
1. Point out to Mr. Johnson that the Colonial Ordinance does not appear to provide for transfer.
2. Consult fw. in a separate despatch - The fee is not extravagant as far as the Attorney General is concerned, he would get as much for advising any private client.
27.5
Page 609
ཚུན །
M. Bransten
The Trademark of the Low Moor
Iron Campany
wan
Registered
19)
27 Jan. 1879 (see they for fazette of that Dats, Notification I cannot gather from Ord. 16
Schedule of Fees thereunde 1873, a what (if anything) should be paid on transfer of such Registration to "Low Moor Company Limited; but I expect the Hungking for litt. Gen. will want his usual fee (1825) for reporting.
applicant
the title
2
the
& that the HtKing
fw will also consider itself
Entitled to charge $25
it were a
a1
Marghe
fresh Registration.
But the charge in that case seem Excessive.
? Send copy (with onj. Enc.)
to
that Schedule be reasmable
scale of fee
fw. suggesting amended by adding
a
be affilied in this case,
w thats such bealth at Agent
ses, (say
to meet such cas
'A
have received the fee £10.8.4 ins Wilkinsmis Trademark
respect of
be
I inform M. Johnson that it will be referred to fur t
Regret boste to fur
vi Johmere d auggest to No.
2.
The write
ishe Jobum that to avoid delay
to
609
the Registration be had better pay £10.8.45 hespect of the dew Mow Campany's Trademark,
understanding
that if a
an
then
lower rate
is fixed the balance will be returned to him
5n927/3
[as the Att. Gents in future in not to have private practice, Should be be allowed to receive his extravagant fee in Connection with Registration of Trademarks? We mighing that.
this opportunity t
take Jake
the scally abolishing then abolishing the attimez feneral's fee altogether the present
as soon an
of that office retires? ]
1. Proust as propane – Sxplaining & Mr. Johnson
that the Colonies ordinanu dons dit appam to
Iride for transfor
參
2. Consult for in a separate despotit - Intr-
The fee
is not satrangant as fus so in Strophany in han
fomuld get as much for advising any privati client_
to
1. 6 perend
27.5
2. I thanks or should decide orthinct
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.